The Founding of Harvard

Kristie and I were in Boston last month. This monument is in the wall of the entryway to Harvard Yard. I knew about its founding, but it was moving to see this up close.

Al Mohler and The Southern Baptist? Seminary, Pt. 2

James P. Boyce and the founders of Southern Seminary were in no way unclear in regards to their beliefs about Holy Scripture. Living, as they did, in a different age with a unique set of temptations to deny the full trustworthiness of Scripture (or miracles, or any aspect of historic Christian belief), these men did not waver. Nor did they see any inconsistency in summarizing in confessional form what they believed the Bible to teach. On the contrary, Boyce viewed such an action as altogether necessary to ensure the long-term faithfulness of a school that would belong to Southern Baptists themselves. He did not mandate that all Southern Baptists agree with the form of doctrine expressed in the Abstract of Principles - only that those who taught in the seminary should have no public or personal reservation in adhering to that statement.


The 1995 call for a new seminary was strange indeed. Knox clearly faulted Mohler for seeking to be true to the founding vision of the seminary. This founding vision did not meet the liking of Knox nor had it been faithfully upheld at many points in the seminary’s history. Yet, while the theology of the seminary’s founding fathers may be viewed as passé or irrelevant (which it is neither), it is a strange argument to say that such theology is inherently un-Baptist. In indicting Mohler and his adherence to the theology of the Abstract of Principles, Knox likewise indicted the very founding of the seminary he regrettably wanted to abandon.

Today, Southern Seminary continues to have the name “Baptist” on the sign out front. And this is no mere hat tip to a denominational identity that in reality has been shed in the days of the Mohler presidency. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary looks with gratitude to God for His providential guiding of men such as Boyce, John Broadus, Basil Manly, Jr., and William Williams. These men believed that, as important as the doctrine of the priesthood of the believer is to Baptist identity, it should never be turned into “freedom” to espouse things contrary to the revealed will of God. Baptists share certain beliefs in common with each other, and they share first-order beliefs in common with Christians from all generations. Both Baptist distinctives and articles of universal Christian confession are clearly laid out in the Abstract of Principles. President Mohler has led the seminary to stand upon this founding document, and it is because of this that the Southern Seminary of 2009 is a confessional and vibrant Baptist institution. We thank God that no new seminary is needed in this generation for Southern Baptists.

Al Mohler and The Southern Baptist? Seminary

In the next two posts, I will reproduce parts of an article that I wrote last year in light of Southern Seminary's 150th birthday in 2009. Enjoy. I am getting close to meeting my deadline with Crossway for the book-length treatment of the subject, to be released in 2029.

More than 150 years ago, throughout the latter half of the 1850’s, James P. Boyce trumpeted the need for a new seminary that would specifically serve the needs of Baptists in the South. The new seminary envisioned by Boyce would serve the churches of the Southern Baptist Convention. This would be faithfully accomplished by the seminary faculty’s adherence to a confessional document (Southern’s Abstract of Principles) and by the promise of academic excellence, comparable to Princeton Theological Seminary in the North.

Boyce and others in favor of such a seminary, after years of making their case for its establishment, finally saw the first class of preachers come to the Greenville, S. C. based school (later removed to Louisville in 1877) in the Fall of 1859. A new seminary was needed, and, by God’s direction, a new seminary was founded.

A strange call for a new seminary came some 140 years after Boyce first articulated the case for a school to train Southern Baptist pastors. This call, found in the April 25, 1995 editorial page of the Kentucky Baptist state newspaper, was made to elicit support from Kentucky Baptists for the idea of abandoning Southern Seminary. Marv Knox, then editor of the Western Recorder, wrote that, “We need a new seminary ‘for such a time as this.” Due to President Albert Mohler’s leadership and theology, the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary had jettisoned its Baptist identity, according to Knox.

The Western Recorder editor held that Baptist identity was to be found in specific notions of freedom and individual autonomy. Knox wrote, “By forsaking the priesthood of the believer, Southern Seminary has committed denominational apostasy. The seminary paint crew ought to white-out ‘Baptist’ on the sign out front. Southern Seminary no longer is Baptist.” Mohler’s insistence upon returning the school to a place of fidelity to the Abstract of Principles and his unapologetic espousing of those truths articulated in the Abstract appeared to threaten what Knox held to be at the very core of Baptist identity. Thus, after laying out his case for why Mohler had deviated from cherished Baptist beliefs, he concluded his article with a less than veiled summons for readers to consider supporting a new school, a school that would counteract the apostasy at Southern Baptist’s flagship seminary – “But how can a non-Baptist seminary prepare fully-trained Baptist ministers? As we look to the future, we will need a theological school or seminary for preparing our ministers. Some will come from other free and faithful schools, but they will not produce enough. Will Kentucky Baptists step forward?”